Observations On Pair jailed for Lawrence murder

Observation on Pair jailed for Lawrence murder To do this article justice I have included below:

Two men found guilty of the 1993 racist murder of Stephen Lawrence in south-east London have been jailed for life.

Gary Dobson will serve a minimum of 15 years and two months, and David Norris 14 years and three months.

The pair were sentenced at the Old Bailey under guidelines in place at the time of the attack and as juveniles because both had been under 18.

Later, detectives said new information about the case had come in since the verdicts were returned 24 hours ago.

Det Ch Insp Clive Driscoll, who was commended by the trial judge for his work on the case, told BBC News the information was currently being evaluated.

Officers from the Lawrence inquiry team will discuss the case at a meeting with senior Scotland Yard officers next week.

‘Hands tied’

Passing sentence, the judge, Mr Justice Treacy, described the crime as a “murder which scarred the conscience of the nation”.

Dobson, 36, and Norris, 35, were the first people convicted over the fatal attack on Mr Lawrence by a group of white youths near a bus stop in Eltham on 22 April 1993.

Speaking outside court, Stephen Lawrence’s mother Doreen said the minimum terms imposed “may be quite low” but she recognised “the judge’s hands were tied” and thanked him for his sentencing remarks which acknowledged the stress the family had suffered for 18 years.

“It’s the beginning of starting a new life,” she said.

Stephen Lawrence’s father, Neville, said: “This is only one step in a long, long journey.”

He thanked the police, the judge and the jury, and called on the pair to “give up” the other people involved in his son’s murder.

At an earlier media conference on Wednesday, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe said: “The other people involved in the murder of Stephen Lawrence should not rest easily in their beds.

“We are still investigating this case and I would just like to take this opportunity, if anybody out there has any more information or any evidence, even after all this time, please tell us then we’ll do the rest.”

In his sentencing remarks, which have now been published online, the judge also said he hoped the convictions of Norris and Dobson would “not close the matter”, and that police would be alert to further lines of inquiry.

 Racist thuggish gang’

A jury found Dobson and Norris guilty of murder on Tuesday after a six-week trial that hinged on new scientific evidence.

BBC correspondents said the press benches were packed for the sentencing, and there was a huge queue for the public gallery. The hearing was delayed as the courtroom had to be rearranged to allow members of Stephen Lawrence’s family to attend, and the judge allowed some journalists to stand.

In passing sentence, Mr Justice Treacy said: “The crime was committed for no other reason than racial hatred.”

He said the black teenager was “completely blameless and helpless”.

“A totally innocent 18 year old youth on the threshold of a promising life was brutally cut down in the street in front of eye witnesses by a racist thuggish gang,” he told Dobson and Norris.

“You were both members of that gang. I have no doubt at all that you fully subscribed to its views and attitudes.”

He said the assault was “a brief but co-ordinated attack, a racist taunt, a charge and a swallowing up of Stephen Lawrence”.

“I’m sure that you knew one of your group was armed with a knife that night,” the judge said. “The evidence does not prove you had the knife, but the holder had it with your approval.”

Mr Justice Treacy said the encounter was not premeditated but Dobson and Norris had been prepared to attack if the opportunity arose.

He said no contrition had been shown.

Mr Justice Treacy said: “Stephen Lawrence is not the only victim of this crime. His family, (two parents, a brother and a sister), whose victim impact statements I have read, have been most grievously affected.

“So has his friend Duwayne Brooks. Of that I have no doubt.”

Mr Brooks, who was with Mr Lawrence on the night of the attack, had wept while giving evidence at the trial.

Failures in the Lawrence case investigation had previously “shamed” police, he said, but they could now be commended for their work, as could the forensic scientists involved in obtaining the evidence which allowed the prosecution of Dobson and Norris to take place.

The judge said the terms were lower than some would expect as he was “constrained” by Parliament and he could not apply tougher sentencing rules drafted in 2003.

As Mr Justice Treacy rose to leave the court, there was applause from some members of the public, but Dobson’s father, Stephen, shouted: “Shame on all of you.”

Outside court, Michael Mansfield QC, who represented the Lawrence family in a 1995 private prosecution, said: “In this particular case, given the nature of the original offence, given their own denial throughout, given the surveillance video which showed a deep-seated hatred, bigotry and violence, it seems to me a parole board will take very great care before releasing these two [Dobson and Norris] onto the streets.”

Doreen Lawrence’s lawyer Imran Khan told BBC News he hoped there were “people out there who see her and recognise that there are still an injustice there and whilst there may not be forensic evidence now there may be people out there whose allegiances have changed… I urge them to come forward sooner rather than later”.

Questioning whether police should feel “a sense of redemption” at the convictions, he added: “If the police say they’re going to investigate further, then they should do so properly. The last thing that should happen is further failures in this case and raising the hopes of the Lawrences.”

 ‘Case reviewed’

Police arrested Dobson and Norris and three other suspects in the months after Mr Lawrence’s murder in April 1993, but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) dropped the case, saying the evidence of a key witness was unreliable.

The CPS later said fresh evidence presented by the Lawrence family’s barrister was not sufficient for a new prosecution, and the family launched a private prosecution against Dobson and two others which failed.

An inquest later delivered a verdict of unlawful killing “in a completely unprovoked racist attack by five youths” and in 1999 a public inquiry into the case led to the Metropolitan Police being branded institutionally racist.

Scientists conducting a review of the case in 2007 found a tiny bloodstain on Dobson’s jacket that could only have come from Mr Lawrence.

They also found a single hair belonging to the teenager on Norris’s jeans. The scientists recovered the material from evidence the police had held all along, using advanced techniques which were not available to the original case scientists.

During their trial, Dobson and Norris denied murdering Mr Lawrence and said their clothing had been contaminated as police mixed up evidence over the years. Detectives spent months establishing the movements and handling of the exhibits since 1993, and the jury was told that contamination was implausible.

Matthew Ryder QC, who represented the Lawrence family in its civil claim against the police told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme the case was “moment when you saw the victims of injustice fighting for justice and the system letting them down and I think for that reason it profoundly changed how we view race and racism within this society”.

The former commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Lord Blair said the case had seen police move from a “colour-blind” approach to policing to one which understood the previous experiences and expectations held by different communities.

“The legacy of Stephen Lawrence is just of the most enormous change possible in policing,” he said.


On 3rd Jan 2012 saw a small victory for the Lawrence Family and their campaign. Hence justice continues for the 3 other assailants who had a hand in the murder of Stephen Lawrence. Not only has the Lawrence family been through hell both the parents are now divorced because of the strain of the murder of Stephen Lawrence.
In 1993 I remember both myself, BRAMU, Trade Unions invited the Stephen Lawrence family to their first public meeting at the TUC and UNSION conferences help raise awareness and raise funds for the campaign.

Whilst I was reminiscing on the first case went to court tensions were very high as it was seen as a high profile case which reek of racial tension with the five accused attending court. Police Outside the court had to control campaigners and supporters of the Stephen Lawrence whist the five walked away free from court.

It was not a happy day when the five walked from court then started to rant racist abuse at our supporters.

I have a lot of admiration for the Lawrence family for their stance to bring to justice for their son. Sadly Stephen died by the hands of the racist murderers.

It has been alleged that the two that committed the murderers are still in Denial that they are innocent.

We now have to up the campaign to bring the other three murderers to justices as the fight is NOT OVER.

The sentencing of Gary Dobson and David Norris for the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence nearly 19 years ago is a tribute to the tenacity of his parents to obtain belated justice for their son.

The jail terms handed down will not reduce the grief felt by Doreen and Neville Lawrence, but their principled and honourable demeanour has impressed millions of people.

The Lawrences’ dogged insistence that their son’s murder should not go unpunished stood in stark contrast to the incompetence and racist assumptions of the police that contrived to assist the killers to evade speedy capture and retribution at the time.

The identity of the gang members who piled in five against one to carry out their gruesome murder has been known from day one.

Anonymous local people phoned the police to identify the suspects, who had a reputation for racist violence and general thuggery, but such was the reputation of their criminal cohorts that few felt confident to speak out openly.

The Lawrence case risked becoming another unsolved miscarriage of justice and this impression was strengthened by the failure of a private prosecution and a policy inquiry that plumbed new depths of shoddiness and cover-up.

The public inquiry conducted by William Macpherson and his committee’s subsequent eponymous report broke new ground in branding Metropolitan Police culture “institutionally racist.”

This important development made clear that, while individual police officers may not be racist, Met practice, attitudes and “canteen culture” conspired to create a body of assumptions that translated into treating black people worse than whites.

As ground-breaking as Macpherson was, it required political reinforcement, which was forthcoming from the Labour government, London Mayor Ken Livingstone and successive Met police commissioners John Stevens and Ian Blair.

Both Stevens and Blair took action to recruit black and ethnic minority police officers and to change structures and attitudes within the Met.

The situation in London, to say nothing of elsewhere in Britain, is still not ideal, as the shooting dead in Tottenham last year of Mark Duggan by police and the subsequent attempted cover-up shows clearly.

The same can be said for the police assassination of Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes on an Underground train in 2005 in the hysterical aftermath of the July Tube and bus terrorist bombings.

Young black men remain more likely to be stopped and searched on city streets than their white counterparts and there is plentiful evidence of persistent racism in the jobs sphere.

However, it is abundantly clear that the London – and indeed Britain – of today is no longer that of 1993 or, worse still, of two or three decades earlier.

For the most part, residents of all backgrounds live, work and enjoy themselves together with minimum friction and hostility.

Racist groups such as the BNP and the EDL still strive to shatter people’s unity and to gain political influence through scapegoating fellow citizens on the basis of perceived national, racial or religious differences.

Establishment politicians, some of whom portray themselves as anti-racist, pander to far-right prejudice by parading their own supposed “toughness” in keeping people who look different out of Britain.

If they resisted this shabby personal opportunism and, like Doreen and Neville Lawrence, concentrated on justice and equality for all, they would be playing their part to create a Britain in which racist murders would be far less likely.


2 responses to “Observations On Pair jailed for Lawrence murder

  1. The verdict came as a relief but could have easily been a different outcome if it hadn’t been for Doreen and Neville’s perseverance and improvements in forensic science.

  2. Glad we now have convictions I must be honest and did not think it would happen ,listening to the evidence we all heard from the trail ,I thought a not guilty verdict was due, but I was not in court to hear all the eveidence .
    My guess is the police know who the rest are and their involvement just dont have the eveidence to bring a prosection that can succeeed in court, the message they must keep giving out is , we are not going away and we will get you sooner or later.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s